Monday, February 1, 2010

The End of Books by Robert Coover: Are They Really Becoming Obsolete? By Brittney Beck

Summary

Coover’s article The End of Books discusses books as potentially becoming an obsolete technology and hypertext becomes a more accepted medium of fictional works. He defines today’s “real world” as “the world of video transmissions, cellular phones, fax machines,[and] computer networks (Coover 706).” According to him, in such a world the classic “line” of a novel will be too restricting. Hypertext offers far more opportunities to explore topic and concepts in works of fiction. However, there are still many challenges in the field of hypertext as it is still being developed and explored. There are the questions of how much linked information is too much and distracts from the purpose of the piece of writing as Coover put very well when he said “how do you move around in infinity without getting lost? (Coover 708)”; additional questions include: how does on criticize or analyze that is never read the same way twice, and how will the reader stay focused on the central idea of the piece of writing without getting lost.
Coover’s intended audience is producers and consumers of literature. In his article he confesses that he is not an expert on hyperspace, but as believes print is becoming obsolete it is important to become more aware of the possibilities of hypertext. He also chose to teach a class on it at Brown University in order to expand his understanding of it and share that understanding with writing students. As Coover began a class on Hypertext Fiction, the relevance of his class is at stake if hypertext does not become a prevalent form of writing and publishing works of fiction.

Inquiry

I only partially agree with Coover. I agree that books will eventually become obsolete, however, not in the near future and I do not believe novels will become obsolete. I also do not believe that hypertext will become the new medium of choice for pieces of fiction. In fact, in a more recent article Coover states that the age of hypertext has come to an end and “this heavily textual era of innovation in the form has given way to the world of the Web (Introduction 705).” I foresee that paper books will eventually become outdated as electronic books such as the Kindle become more prevalent and available to the public. I personally have one, and one similarity there is in the electronic book to hypertext is that words are linked to a dictionary and can be looked up on demand to further the reader’s understanding of the content. Electronic books will be more efficient than paper books because they can store numerous books in one small light weight device saving space and one’s back. It makes books less expensive as there is no paper and ink to pay for, and makes new books conveniently available from the comfort of one’s home. Works of fiction will always provide a form of entertainment however the form they come in will change as technology changes.

1) Do you believe books will eventually become obsolete and if so what will replace them?
2) What are some pros and cons of hypertext that Coover does not mention?
3) On page 706 Coover claims that “lines” are restricting and tyrannical. Are “lines” really restricting or are they freeing in that they are transparent and provide a window to a different story?

5 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I believe print will always be in existence because it is embedded in history. There will always be people who prefer reading off of paper rather than off a screen. However, I do believe there will be a dramatic shift from print novels to electronic ones. My grandfather recently received a Kindle as a gift and quite honestly, has no idea how it works. He much prefers a tangible book to read instead of this little contraption. As the older generations move along, I think the younger ones will be more open to electronic reading such as that on a Kindle. It is simpler, cheaper, and more high tech: exactly what the new generations look for in any devices they use. Textbooks on the computer are becoming ever more popular as are novels, and at some point in the future I believe they will dominate the literary world.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Also in response to question 1, I agree with Tory in that some people will always prefer a concrete object to read in front of them. I enjoy the sentimentality of reading a greeting card rather than viewing an animated electronic-card. However, most forms of printed text are definitely on the road to becoming obsolete. I do not believe I have seen someone with a printed dictionary in 7 years. The days of learning how to alphabetize are fading. The act of flipping through pages looking up the definition of a word, back-tracking those pages, cross-referencing it with a synonym, etc, is so tedious when you could just perform a search online. In fractions of seconds, hypertext will further guide you to synonyms, antonyms, figures of speech, and other links that are applicable to your search. As Brittney pointed out, Coover referred to the line as ‘restricting’. If a line is two-dimensional, I believe infinite access to information provided by hyperspace and hypertext allows the written word to become three-dimensional.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I also agree with everybody that there will never be a time when we completely do away with books. But I do think that as the technology expands, it would be very beneficial to take advantage of the aspects that it can provide, especially for students. If students could buy an electronic device such as kindle then they would be able to just download text books onto the device instead of having to buy them, saving money in the long run. Another reason is that it would be easier to keep things current. One of my high school history teachers used to complain that the text books were not "up-to-date." With a device such as kindle, it could be possible to update texts and that way the learning is alwayss a new experience.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As Spencer mentioned, the academic value in being able to have a media capable of continuous up to date information is definitely a large catalyst towards the electronic book interface becoming more prevalent. I feel that physical books will never become obsolete as far as leisurely reading is concerned, however, for multiple reasons. There have been many studies correlating eye problems and over exposure to electronic screens. Until that problem can be fully rectified I don’t feel avid readers will allow literature transfer to a purely electronic interface as a means of distribution. As Tory pointed out the age/technology gap keeps many older readers from embracing the new interface offered by a Kindle. The convenience while on the go that can be provided by a Kindle or similar product has created a niche for that media interface no doubt, but based off many peoples comments in class and from my personal experience I don’t believe the comfort gained by holding a single unchanging book and reading it cover to cover will ever allow physical books to become obsolete.

    ReplyDelete